GOODYEAR LAKE ASSOCIATION INC.

Celebrating Over 100 Years of Quality Lakeside Living

HOME
DONORS & SPONSORS
GAS DRILLING
NOTICES
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
EVENTS - NEW
JOIN US
GOODYEAR LAKE GIFTS
DISCOUNTS
BUSINESS PARTNERS
HISTORY OF THE LAKE
GENERAL MEETINGS
OUR TOWN
BOARD MINUTES
TOWN OFFICIALS
FORUM
EAGLES
JUST FOR KIDS
LAKE ECOLOGY
VOLUNTEERS
PROPERTIES
LAKE PHOTOS
RECREATION
RESTAURANTS & REVIEWS
WANT ADS
COMPUTER TIPS
CONTACT US
LINKS
Site Map
The following is an overview of the concerns that the Goodyear Lake Association Inc. brought to the attention of the Town Board and their answers to those concerns. If any member of the Town Board wishes to speak to these concerns again, they may do so in this forum. We will print their response completely, as we will the responses of any other taxpaying individual. We ask only that no names are used, and no personal attacks are made. (Entered 3/16/09)


Town of Milford Report Card

The following is a list of concerns the Goodyear Lake Association Inc. has brought in front of the Milford Town Board for the last two years and the Town’s response to these issues. Also included in this report are any actions that the Town took against the Association for whatever reason they may have had.

1)    We repeatedly asked them to post an agenda before each Town Board meeting. We were repeatedly denied, even though it is obvious at each meeting that they indeed do have an agenda they work through. We were asked if we did not trust our elected officials to do their job. Our answer: no, we do not trust them, not when the board members themselves have no idea of the agenda until the night of the meeting, and/or the members make no effort to contact their constituents if they know of an agenda. This is not open government.

2)    We asked them repeatedly for 2 alternates, as provided for by state law, to the zoning board of appeals. We did this so a full board be made available to a petitioner in case of a conflict of interest on the part of a board member, or in the case of an extended leave by a board member. With a five member ZBA, any 2 to 2 tie is a loss if one member abstains; with only four on the board, a 2 to 2 is a loss; with only three members present a 2 to 1 vote in favor is also a loss. We were denied our request.

3)    We asked for speed bumps to be placed around the lake in the summer. This was done, but not everywhere we asked they be put;

Lakeshore Dr. So.
was ignored. When people complained to the Town about the bumps, the Town told them that GYLA wanted the speed bumps, not the Town.

 

4)    We asked, when scrap metal prices were at their highest, if they Town could engage, as did the Town of Hartwick, in a town-wide scrap metal drive. We were told “No”, because a few out of the entire town might throw garbage in the bin and not metal. Meanwhile, the Town of Hartwick made over $1500, after costs, for the Town on their drive.

5)    We asked that the sign on County Route 35 be corrected from “Sillman Cove Rd.” to its correct spelling “

Silliman Cove Rd.
” This was done.

6)    . When we put a temporary building on our property at Journey’s End, similar to buildings placed all around the area, we were cited by the ZEO for not having a building permit. When we asked why we received the citation and not all the others, we were given no satisfactory answer, even though, in some of the other cases, this same ZEO himself told people that they needed no permit for a temporary building. We paid the fee. The others have not

7)    We were cited by the ZEO for operating an illegal parking lot on our property on Journey’s End, and told that the property was poorly maintained.  The property is obviously carefully and constantly maintained by GYLA. There was no illegal parking occurring. The citation was dropped by the Town.

8)    Citing a conflict of interest and partiality, a 15 year, trained member of the ZBA was dropped from his position. The reason given was that two members of the ZBA belonged to GYLA. Now we have only 1 member from the lake area representing the largest voting and residential tax-paying block in the Town, while 4 of the ZBA members represent the least populated, outlying districts.

9)    The Town did support our efforts to celebrate the Centennial of the Dam & the Lake.

10) Our repeated complaints about the conditions of the properties on Maple Street still have not been resolved. These “ad hoc” dumps need to be taken care of; they are a violation of the Town’s own Junk Law.

11) The Town has helped in the removal of the piled-up water chestnuts pulled from the river and lake, although some piles were left to rot in place, leaving live seeds close to the water’s edge.

12) The Town has not actively pursued the training of its officers on the ZBA and Planning Board as required by law; some members have not attended once in 2 years. We are at a loss as to why to Town would be soft on training and education when their decisions might impact people’s very existence.

SCORE: Positive: 4  Negative: 8